The Blinged-Out Master Plan for Memorial Park

City Council Quality of Life Committee Should Send Expensive, Overdone Master Plan Back to Drawing Board

March 24, 2015

The Memorial Park Conservancy is sending its $3.2 million unfinished master plan for Memorial Park to the Houston City Council’s Quality of Life Committee on Wednesday, March 25. The plan is so far a gaudy, overstuffed mish-mosh of bad, hazy, contradictory, wrong, and incomplete ideas developed apparently with the main goal of spending some $200-300 million, half of it public money.

The committee should reject this tacky, impractical document and consider directing hundreds of millions of dollars towards the purchase of new parkland instead.

Among other things, the plan misleadingly describes Buffalo Bayou as it flows along Memorial Park as “altered.” A slide shown at the final presentation of the plan to a packed audience at the Museum of Fine Arts Houston March 9 outlined the bayou in bright red and identified it as “altered Buffalo Bayou.” (See slide 18.)

We were stunned. Reasonable people would assume that “altered” meant channelized, dug up, scraped, engineered, rebuilt, etc. by humans or machines. In fact, the bayou flowing past Memorial park is one of the last unaltered stretches remaining in the city.

But no, “altered” in this case means “changed over time,” explains Shellye Arnold, executive director of the park conservancy. The bayou has adjusted to increased water flows from increased runoff due to development and paving; therefore the bayou is “altered,” says Arnold in an email.

Central Texas limestone entryway proposed for Houston's Memorial Park. Image from Memorial Park Conservancy.

Central Texas limestone entryway proposed for Houston’s Memorial Park. Image from Memorial Park Conservancy.

The conservancy is developing the ten-twenty-thirty-year plan with the Houston Parks and Recreation Department and the Uptown TIRZ 16, which is funneling our tax money into the blinged-out project. It’s not clear who is in charge of the master plan, or even who is now in charge of Memorial Park, for that matter.

The Memorial Park Conservancy is a non-profit organization founded in 2000 as a successor to the informal citizens’ advisory committee that previously protected the park. Reportedly the conservancy will be asked to raise some $150 million for maintenance or capital improvements in addition to some $150 million contributed by the TIRZ, which by law can only spend money on capital improvements, i.e. building stuff. The Galleria-area Uptown TIRZ doubled its boundaries in 2013 by annexing Memorial Park and the Hogg Bird Sanctuary.

Apparently no one but members of the city council is in a position to say impolitely, no, whoa, wait! This plan is an outrage. We urge City Council to do that.

The final tipping factor for some of us, on top of an onslaught of increasingly bad ideas, was the tasteless proposal for large, offensive stone walls of Central Texas limestone at the entrances to the park and surrounding the inexplicably closed section of the park off Woodway west of Loop 610. (This enchanting part of the park, closed for something like a decade now and sometimes not even included in Memorial Park Conservancy maps, will remain closed until the master planners decide what to do with it, says TIRZ Memorial Park Project Director Sarah Newbery. And then, of course, we will have to wait for them do whatever they decide to do, which could take decades, if ever, since they would still have to raise the money to do whatever.)

Currently the park uses modest, understated wooden signage, and it should stay that way. Dry, heavy, light-colored Central Texas limestone is grossly inappropriate in every way for natural park settings in lush, humid, subtropical Houston, and unfortunately limestone seems to be increasingly in use in parks such as Buffalo Bayou Park downstream.

But there are greater offenses. The plan, developed by the New York/Charlottesville firm of Nelson, Byrd, Woltz, was supposed to respect the park as a natural park, set along the riparian wilderness of Buffalo Bayou.

Instead we have a proposal for numerous encroachments and destruction of what little natural area we have remaining, with significantly increased maintenance costs at a time when the city cannot even afford proper maintenance of the park now. The over-reaching plan tries to do too much for too many people, and frankly at times the planners seem to not know what they are doing. The plan proposes the removal of a large but unspecified number of trees for the creation of prairie and savannah and the planting of new trees (and plants), shockingly some of them either not native to Texas at all or not native to this area or even to the United States. (The $14,000 landscaping of the new Running Trails Center with non-native plants, including dog-toxic sago palms, does not inspire confidence. Nor does the impermeable parking lot. Are we thinking about runoff, drainage?) The list of wildlife species in the area is also filled with errors.

Memorial Drive will be turned into something like New York City’s Holland Tunnel by a land bridge connecting the north and south parts of the park, and further west the drive will be moved at great expense and loss of forest. There will be less woodlands and more parking lots, history displays, playgrounds, obtrusive gateways, observation towers, planted gardens, a dizzying inter-looping array of tracks for slow runners and fast runners, bike tracks for children, bike tracks for families, tracks for mountain bikers, racers; hikers and horseback riders, many more inter-looping trails, including a twelve-foot-wide concrete semi-circular roadway in the southern “nature area” near the banks and ravines of the bayou. And some hundred acres of prairie and woodlands will be planted with oppressively rigid, regular rows of pine trees. That’s just a sampling.

Houstonians need places to get out and exercise, picnic, swim, play ball, jog, and ride bikes. But they can’t do it all in one place. We need more public parks, swimming pools, athletic fields, places to ride bikes, walk our dogs, and we need more trees. Memorial Park is already the thirty-sixth most visited park in the United States, just edging out Centennial Olympic Park in Atlanta, according to the Trust for Public Land. It should be treated gently and respected as a subtle park with rare urban wilderness areas that was always intended to be as natural and unbuilt as possible.

Let’s come up with a plan for that. Sort of like the master plan they came up with in 2004.

The Memorial Park Conservancy, by the way, supports the $6 million project to strip, scrape, dredge, fill, reroute, create a new channel and landscape one of the last natural stretches of Buffalo Bayou, including magnificent very old cliffs, as it flows past the park and the Hogg Bird Sanctuary. But the conservancy strangely states on its website that it has “no plans to channelize” the bayou. Arnold explains the contradiction in an email by saying that stripping, scraping, dredging, filling, rerouting, creating a new channel, etc., is not “channelizing” because it does not “strip, straighten, and concrete” the bayou.

The Quality of Life Committee meets at 2 p.m. Wednesday, March 25, in city council chambers, City Hall, 901 Bagby. Master plan designer Thomas Woltz is scheduled to speak.

7 thoughts on “The Blinged-Out Master Plan for Memorial Park”

  1. Richard Hyde says:

    I will attend the meeting tomorrow at City Hall and hope to get a chance to speak out against their plans for Buffalo Bayou and their environment report basically depicting the park without much forest, just a big savanna.

  2. eli says:

    The main problem is that there are no more civic minded people like the Hermanns and Hoggs.
    Careful tampering with Memorial park…..has anyone looked at the covenants covering the gifting of Memorial park to the city? I suggest you do so.

    1. Yes, we have looked very carefully at the deeds and covenants covering the transfer of Memorial Park to the city.

  3. Olive hershey says:

    I cannot attend City Council meeting today. Thank you for appearing there to express the dismay many Houstonians feel about the new Memorial Park Master Plan. Olive Hershey

  4. Rebecca Allen says:

    Just when I thought it could not get worse. Write your council members!

  5. Wow says:

    What the he’ll is wrong with you people? You sound like a bunch crazy crotchety old geezers who don’t want any kind of positive change for YOUR city. Re read what you wrote up there and see if it makes any kind of logical sense. You spend the whole article using a bunch of hyperbole and barely providing any reasons why those plan is bad. OMFG?!?! They used the word altered? What a scandal!!

    And all of your complaints come from a place of ignorance. First the public money. Where the hell do you suggest the TIRZ use their money to buy land in Uptown for a park? The entire cost would go to a single land purchase and plus they are not even legally allowed too spend money on that. But if you wrote an article on the subject I am sure your already knew that already right? Second, it is a plan, not exact project details. You can whine about the limestone in 10 years if/when they ever actually propose to build it. But judging by your tone, you desire modest aka undesirable/boring/dilapidated infrastructure and likely will not be listened to just as you were just completely ignored yesterday by council.

    Good luck in your old age becoming the proverbial grumpy old man/woman. Luckily we have a new guard taking over the city who thankfully see the potential in investing and restoring all that people like you let rot, decay, and give our city a bad reputation.

    1. We have a difference of opinion about spending public funds wisely and the value of preserving Memorial Park as a rare place for Houstonians to experience nature. We are fortunate to have such a woodland park. Memorial Park can be beautiful, elegant, understated, and well maintained without becoming a glitzy adjunct of the Galleria. Such a woodland park preserved in the middle of one of the largest cities in the country would truly attract worldwide attention, if that’s your goal.

      As for buying new parkland, if the Uptown TIRZ can buy the Hines Waterwall, it would seem that the TIRZ can buy property and build parks, playing fields, and public swimming pools. See:

      What the TIRZ legally cannot do is maintenance. So all these new landscaped gardens, groves, timing tracks, etc. cut out of the woods will have to be manicured and maintained by the city, which can hardly afford to maintain the park as it is. (See park’s current state.) The Memorial Park Conservancy can help raise money for maintenance. But philanthropists do not usually do maintenance either.

      We are in favor of improvements to Memorial Park. (Though some of us are kind of fond of the old tumble down concrete picnic tables.) We just think they should be practical, done in good taste (i.e. barely noticeable), and in keeping with what the park is supposed to be. The recent history of projects in Memorial Park make us skeptical. See the ugly new Running Trails Center, planted with non-native, toxic plants and surrounded by an impermeable parking lot in a park with drainage issues, and the massive new drainage outfall in the park at Woodway, which somehow got built over a public boat launch and nature area on Buffalo Bayou with $1.36 million in public funds and no thought for public use. Oh, and then there’s the conservancy’s support for the $6 million project to destroy one of the last natural stretches of Buffalo Bayou flowing past Memorial Park and shore up the privately-owned banks of the River Oaks Country Club.

      But you’re right. This master plan is practically meaningless, other than the fact that it cost the taxpayers $3.2 million. These battles over cutting down trees, limestone walls, parking lots and land bridges will all have be fought all over again down the road.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *